New York Attorney General Letitia James is now facing scrutiny over allegations of mortgage fraud, with claims that she misrepresented her primary residence on official documents. According to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, an April investigation uncovered documentation errors suggesting that James listed a property in Norfolk, Virginia as her primary residence while she was legally required to reside in New York as Attorney General.
Leavitt emphasized this alleged misconduct during a recent press briefing, but rather than focus solely on the facts of the mortgage probe, she repeatedly referenced James’s high-profile civil case against former President Donald Trump—an entirely unrelated legal matter. Leavitt stated that the President "wants to see James held accountable," accusing her of weaponizing the justice system and branding her a "corrupt fraudster" who pursued Trump out of political animus.
“She was going to prosecute Donald Trump before she even knew if he committed a crime,” Leavitt asserted, drawing a direct line between James’s past investigation and the current allegations against her, despite their distinct legal contexts.
James’s civil fraud case against Trump—once a headline-grabbing legal battle—resulted in penalties that were later reduced to zero. However, earlier this month, James filed a request with the New York Court of Appeals to reinstate those financial penalties.
The mention of James during the press briefing was prompted by the irony that she, once the pursuer, is now under investigation herself. The core allegation is that she claimed a Virginia home as her primary residence while holding office in New York, a potential violation of both state law and mortgage regulations.
The conflation of James’s mortgage fraud probe with her prosecution of Trump raises questions about whether political motivations are coloring the administration’s rhetoric. Critics argue that drawing a connection between the two serves more as a deflection than a legal argument, potentially undermining the seriousness of both investigations.
This case parallels the Lisa Cooknprobe in thatbtwo Back womenin high posituon are both beung accused of misrepresenting their prinary place of reaidence on mortgage documents. Both aituations involves referrala from the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Wiliam Pukte, heir of Pulte Hones and Trump ally appointee heads the agency.
James says she sees the probe as retribution.